Participant attrition from statewide, population-based Survey of the Health of Wisconsin into the longitudinal SHOW COVID-19 cohort.

PURPOSE: Longitudinal studies are essential for examining how social and institutional determinants of health, historical and contemporary, affect disparities in COVID-19 related outcomes. The unequal impacts of COVID-19 likely exacerbated selected attrition in longitudinal research. This study examines attrition and survey mode effects in the SHOW COVID-19 study which recruited from a statewide, representative cohort. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participants were recruited from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) cohort. Online surveys, or phone interviews, were administered at three timepoints during 2020-2021. The surveys captured social, behavioral, and structural determinants of health and the lived experience. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to examine predictors of participation and survey mode effects. RESULTS: A total of 2304 adults completed at least one COVID-19 online survey. Participants were more educated, older, and more likely to be female, married, non-Hispanic, and White compared to non-participants. Phone participants were older, less educated, and more likely be non-White, food insecure, and have co-morbidities compared to online participants. Mode effects were seen with reporting COVID-19 beliefs, loneliness, and anxiety. CONCLUSION: The SHOW COVID-19 cohort offers unique longitudinal data but suffered from selected attrition. Phone interview is an important mode for retention and representation.

Self-Reported Hearing Loss Is Associated With Poorer Health Care Access, Delays, and Communication With Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin COVID-19 Community Impact Survey.

PURPOSE: This article aimed to evaluate associations of self-reported hearing loss with health care access and delays and difficulties communicating with health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: The COVID-19 Community Impact Survey was administered online to a sample of participants from the population-based Survey of the Health of Wisconsin study cohort in Spring 2021. Hearing loss was defined as self-reported fair or poor hearing. Difficulty with health care access and delays were defined as self-reporting needing but not getting medical care or self-reporting delays in appointments due to COVID-19, respectively. Poor communication with health care providers was defined as self-reported difficulties communicating with health care providers due to wearing a mask during the COVID-19 pandemic. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between hearing loss and the health care outcomes. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). First, models were adjusted for age and sex. Next, models were additionally adjusted for education, race/ethnicity, self-rated health, and number of chronic conditions. RESULTS: This study included 1,582 participants (62.3% women; 11.9% non-White; age range: 18-75+ years). The number of participants with hearing loss was 196 (12.4%). After multivariable adjustment, self-reported hearing loss was associated with poorer health care access (OR = 2.41, 95% CI [1.62, 3.59]), health care delays (OR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.37, 2.71]), and increased difficulty communicating with health care providers wearing face masks (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [2.15, 5.08]) during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on difficulties accessing and using health care are likely exacerbated for individuals with hearing loss. There is a need for interventions that will optimize health care experiences for individuals with hearing loss, particularly when face masks and/or telecommunications are used to provide health care services.

Associations of Dietary Intake With Self-Reported Hearing Loss: Findings From the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations of dietary intake components with hearing loss. METHOD: Participants were from the population-based Survey of the Health of Wisconsin. The Block food frequency questionnaire measured dietary intake of carbohydrates, fiber, protein, free (added) sugars, fruits, vegetables, saturated and trans fats, and glycemic index. Intake was categorized into quintiles (Q). Hearing loss was self-reported. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of dietary determinants with hearing loss. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Final models were adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, and regular physical activity. RESULTS: There were 2,839 participants (56% women; Mage = 48.2 [SD = 14.5] years) included. Higher consumption of trans fat (Q5: OR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.27, 2.64]) and higher glycemic index (Q5: OR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.00, 1.80]) were associated with increased odds of hearing loss. Hearing loss was associated with fruit, saturated- and trans-fat intake in women, and trans-fat intake and glycemic index in men. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary intake was associated with self-reported hearing loss. Research on mechanistic pathways of associations and public health interventions to prevent hearing loss is needed.

Self-reported hearing loss is associated with poorer perceived health care access, timeliness, satisfaction, and quality: Findings from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is a highly prevalent chronic condition impacting communication and may negatively influence patients' health care experiences. OBJECTIVE: Determine associations of hearing loss with perceived health care access, timeliness, satisfaction, and quality in a representative sample of the general population. METHODS: The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) is a household-based examination survey that collects data from a representative sample of Wisconsin residents. SHOW participants from years 2008-2013 with data on self-reported hearing loss and health care access, timeliness, satisfaction, and quality were included in this study. Age- and sex- and multivariable-adjusted (additionally adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, public health region, smoking, chronic disease, self-reported health, and insurance coverage) logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of hearing loss with participants' health care experiences. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There were 2438 individuals (42.1% men) included in this study with an average age of 48.3 (range 21-74; standard deviation [SD] 14.4) years. The number of participants who self-reported hearing loss was 642 (26.3%). After multivariable adjustment, hearing loss was associated with increased odds of perceived difficulties with health care access (OR 1.47 [1.05, 2.05]), timeliness (OR 1.69 [1.23, 2.32]), quality (OR 2.54 [1.50, 4.32]), and satisfaction (OR 2.50 [1.51, 4.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high prevalence of hearing loss and the growing aging population, there is an urgent need to prioritize interventions to improve health care provision for individuals with hearing loss.

Can Electrocochleography Help Preserve Hearing After Cochlear Implantation With Full Electrode Insertion?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) monitoring during cochlear implant (CI) surgery on postoperative hearing preservation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss meeting the CI criteria who selected an Advanced Bionics CI. METHODS: Patients were randomized to CI surgery either with audible ECochG monitoring available to the surgeon during electrode insertion or without ECochG monitoring. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing preoperative unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to postoperative LF-PTA at CI activation. Pre- and post-CI computed tomography was used to determine electrode scalar location and electrode translocation. RESULTS: Eighty-five adult CI candidates were enrolled. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) unaided preoperative LF-PTA across the sample was 54 (17) dB HL. For the whole sample, hearing preservation was "good" (i.e., LF-PTA change 0-15 dB) in 34.5%, "fair" (i.e., LF-PTA change >15-29 dB) in 22.5%, and "poor" (i.e., LF-PTA change ≥30 dB) in 43%. For patients randomized to ECochG "on," mean (SD) LF-PTA change was 27 (20) dB compared with 27 (23) dB for patients randomized to ECochG "off" ( p = 0.89). Seven percent of patients, all of whom were randomized to ECochG off, showed electrode translocation from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli. CONCLUSIONS: Although intracochlear ECochG during CI surgery has important prognostic utility, our data did not show significantly better hearing preservation in patients randomized to ECochG "on" compared with ECochG "off."

Effect of exceeding compliance voltage on speech perception in cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: In cochlear implants, the maximum current I (Amperes) that can be delivered on a cochlear implant electrode is determined by V = I * R, where V = compliance voltage (Volts) and R = electrode impedance (Ohms). Generally, electrode impedances are measured during each clinical visit and are used to set electrical stimulation parameters in cochlear implants. However, electrode impedances can rise during the course of cochlear implant use and lead to electrical stimulation voltage requirements exceeding the maximum compliance voltage of the medical device. Electric stimulation requirements that exceed the compliance voltage lead to clipping of the biphasic electrical pulse (current going into the cochlea) and are known to adversely affect cochlear implant outcomes. DESIGN: Thirteen (11 unilateral and 2 bilateral) Advanced Bionics cochlear implant patients with a HiRes 90k™ cochlear implant participated in this study. Speech perception scores were measured using the patient's baseline clinical program with the most comfortable loudness levels (M-levels) and the following four test programs: (1) stimulation clipped at 15% below clinical M-levels (15%C) (2) stimulation clipped at 30% below clinical M-levels (30%C) (3) M-levels decreased by 15% (15%M) and (4) M-levels decreased by 30% (30%C). Speech perception scores were measured using AzBio sentences presented at 60 dB SPL in quiet and in the presence of multi-talker babble (+10 dB SNR). RESULTS: Relative to the clinical baseline program, speech perception scores with the four test programs decreased in both quiet and noisy listening conditions. In quiet, speech perception scores measured with the 30%M and 30%C programs were significantly (p < 0.001) poorer than the baseline program. No significant differences in speech perception scores were measured between the baseline and the 15%C or 15%M programs. In the noisy listening condition, speech perception scores were significantly poorer than the baseline program for the 15%C (p = 0.008), 30%C (p < 0.001), and 30%M (p < 0.001) programs. No significant differences in speech perception scores were obtained between the baseline and the 15%M program in the noisy listening condition. Speech perception scores measured with the 30%C program were significantly (p < 0.001) poorer than those with the 30%M program, suggesting that clipping was more detrimental than reducing electrical stimulation levels. CONCLUSION: Small amounts (15%) of clipping can significantly decrease speech perception in the presence of background noise. Large amounts (30%) of both clipping and M-level reduction may lead to significantly poorer speech perception in quiet and in background noise. The decrease in speech perception scores can most likely be attributed to reduced volume and poorer spectro-temporal representation. Therefore, it is important to establish comfortably loud electrical stimulation levels without exceeding the compliance voltage to maximize cochlear implant outcomes.